<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pancentric Blogs &#187; people</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.pancentric.com/tag/people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.pancentric.com</link>
	<description>Pancentric is a London-based digital agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:37:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Folksonomies and Taxonomies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/05/14/folksonomies-and-taxonomies/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/05/14/folksonomies-and-taxonomies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pancentric.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have found really informed article on folksonomies and taxonomies at FUMSI today here. The author comes down on the side of a blended approach as do we, and adds some useful insight into how this can fail. I would also expand on the use of folksonomies for marketing insight, whether it is for SEO [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/05/14/folksonomies-and-taxonomies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effective Meetings</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/04/17/effective-meetings/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/04/17/effective-meetings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pancentric.com/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I picked this up on Tech Republic and think it deserves a plug &#8211; Don&#8217;t sweat the small stuff too early its a recognition that sometimes the details slow down decision making and how it is easy to get distracted from the bigger picture, and your goals, by trying to get all the details tied [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/04/17/effective-meetings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New ways to think about your audience</title>
		<link>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/02/13/new-ways-to-think-about-your-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/02/13/new-ways-to-think-about-your-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.pancentric.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting to hear John Micklethwait the editor of the Economist on the BBC Today programme this morning talking about his readership. He says that rather than thinking about them in terms of Income, Intelligence, etc. they have started thinking in a more psychometric way and asking &#8220;how curious they are&#8221;, and whether they would be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.pancentric.com/2009/02/13/new-ways-to-think-about-your-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

